Possibly spotting Pauline

September 15th, 2004

On election day, I would not recognise my local Public Primary School without it being

  1. sad
  2. underfunded
  3. difficult to negotiate for disabled or NESB voters
  4. strewn with faded pink Penne and green Rigatoni necklaces
  5. barren as a desert
  6. and even less inviting.
  7. Populated by a right-wing nutter (or xxiii)
  8. with some fundamentalist message.

I patiently wait for the ‘L-Z’ queue to move along, then spot my name; upside-down, 2.3 full minutes before Rosie here to help can.

I love the spectacle of a little bit of Pauline.

It might even make me vote early, and vote often.

Minimum Noninterventionism

September 14th, 2004

Alexander Downer is brilliant at doublespeak.
He tells us that,

"Hostage negotiators are on standby, but said that did not mean the government would negotiate with terrorists. We would obviously in the circumstances where Australians were taken hostage try to get those Australians released, we’re not going to go into the details of what methodology we would use to do that. We will not be making concessions to terrorists."

Prime Minister John Howard refused to comment on the hostage negotiators.

"I’m not going to get into the operational side of the situation that may in fact not exist, but our position remains that we will not alter our foreign policy, our defence policy, our security policy in response to any threat of terrorist organisations." He said.

Gee whiz Alexander, what do we pay our negotiators to do then?
Be on standby for standing by?
Surely, at some point they have to make contact, create a discourse and negotiate for change eg. Release the hostages.

Unless Negotiator is the less oft used word for ‘Sharpshooter’ .

Downer goes on to say,

"They’re [The Australian Foreign Affairs Department] not entirely certain of all the number of Australians in Iraq. You’re talking of a large number of Australians presumably who aren’t registered with the embassy. Their (the department’s) advice, I’d have to say is a bit thin."

Yes, and this is technically a fishnet!
Please Alexander, just take long-service leave and never come back!

Meanwhile in the top paddock…

September 14th, 2004

Both Howard and Latham will not negotiate with the terrorists.

Howard claims "These are evil people, you can’t make any concessions to them."

"Australian Federal Police (AFP) Commissioner Mick Keelty says hostage negotiators are on stand-by to fly to [the] Middle East if they are required.
Mr Keelty says the AFP began preparing some time ago in case Australians were taken hostage in Iraq."

Concession
(n.) A thing yielded; an acknowledgment or admission; a grant; esp. a grant by government of a privilege or right to do something.

(n.) The act of conceding or yielding; usually implying a demand, claim, or request, and thus distinguished from giving, which is voluntary or spontaneous.

Negotiation
(n.) The act or process of negotiating; a treating with another respecting sale or purchase. etc.

(n.) The transaction of business between nations; the mutual intercourse of governments by diplomatic agents, in making treaties, composing difference, etc.
-The Online Plain Text English Dictionary

Mark-Man of Hair and Stamina

September 12th, 2004

The debate has just finished and I voted for Mark Latham.
Kick back Mark, you are my Prime Minister in waiting.

John Howard looked like he was up way past his bedtime!

I advise a girl-eye-for-the-dead-guy makeover.
New hair and slow release multi-vitamins.

PIERS AKERMAN – A RANK PREMISE

September 12th, 2004

I was up early and watching the insiders on ABC.

Piers Akerman sitting in the "Right Wing" chair (which incidentally forces the occupant to place their feet in the only turd brown square on the whole carpet) does what he does so well, stick up for the coalition and denigrate all opposition.

In his final comment A RANK names Brian Deegan the idiot of the week because of his call to sit and talk with JI. What is so threatening about sitting and talking?

A RANK prefers to absent himself from the human devastation involved and any alternate ways of reaching a workable, negotiated agreement that doesn’t involve Troops and Force.

Perhaps listening would help!