More tinsel, and find me a Virgin.

December 5th, 2004

Prime Minister Howard, not usually a fan of flambuoyance, wants more Christmas decorations on display and a return of the virgin in the Sydney CBD.

In response to Clover Moore’s explanation of Sydney CBD’s December street display

"[…]the approach is consistent with a multicultural, multi-faith Australia."

John Howard uttered this:

"Christmas is not only a religious festival, but it’s also part of the history and the culture of this country. And the very idea that you win acceptance by denying your own identity is pathetic. It’s always been at the heart of what I regard as the harmful aspects of multicultural zeal.

And can I say that I was very disappointed some years ago when a lot of the department stores began…abandoned nativity scenes."

Eight years later…

December 3rd, 2004

As I was watching Lateline on the ABC tonight I saw Pat Dodson who joined Michael Long (and Pat’s brother Mick) in a meeting with the Prime Minister.

It reminded me of a meeting between two of the four men in May of 1996.

Having lived in the Top End for some time, I often had the pleasure of meeting and listening to Pat (and to a lesser degree Mick) through the NT Trades & Labor Council.

Most memorable was the emotional foreword Pat gave at The Inaugural Lingiari Lecture, delivered by Sir William Deane, (who was at the time) Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia at the invitation of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation in Darwin, on 22 August 1996 titled Some Signposts From Daguragu.

We had never before (or since) seen the Auditorium at the Northern Territory University (recently renamed Charles Darwin University) so overflowing with lovers of Lecture!

In a speech given at the National Press Club in Canberra on 28 November 1997, a few weeks before he was to finish his term as Chairperson of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation after six years at the helm, Pat Dodson had this to say about the Howard Government:

"In recent times we have seen that commitment from the parliament on reconciliation weaken and dim. It was a multi-party commitment to which the Government is no longer committed. The Government is no longer demonstrating the leadership required.
The Government chooses not to act on the pragmatic and practical recommendations of the Council’s social justice package, despite a major consultation process with the Australian community;

It chooses not to apologise to the Stolen Generations despite the example of State and Territory parliaments, major church groups, and many thousands of individual Australians.

And now it has chosen not to act on the heart-felt cries for justice and fair dealing in its response to the Wik decision."

Tonight, eight years later, Pat is still an imposing figure.
Still generous.
Still wise.
Still optimistic.

Shame we can’t say the same for John HoWARd.

Keelty, frank and fearless…again

December 2nd, 2004

I predict that Mick Keelty must be ready to retire. Otherwise he would not have made such a bold and frank statement, again.

Last March after Mick’s little outburst of truth, Alexander Downer and John HoWARd went halves and bought him Watson’s Dictionary of Weasel Words.
Mick is using it,

  1. to prop open the back door
  2. has read it and is claiming back language with meaning

I’m going with option b.
I can just see Mick quoting Don’s sentiment saying:

"Weasel words are the words of the powerful, the treacherous and the unfaithful, spies, assassins and thieves. Bureaucrats and ideologues love them. Tyrants cannot do without them. The Newspeak of Orwell’s 1984 is an invention, but also a satire on real states such as the Soviet Union where death from starvation and abuse in slave camps was recorded by officials as "failure of the heart muscle". Were any five words ever more melancholy than this?

Politicians readily convince themselves that weaseling is no less essential in their affairs. When certain remarks by Richard Nixon turned out to have been untrue, his minders described them as inoperative. John Howard and his ministers chose words that persuaded the public to believe that the refugees on a sinking boat had thrown their children into the sea, and that the Government was right, therefore, to stop them landing in Australia. These people seeking asylum in Australia were not the sort of people Australians wanted in this country.

It is possible that only weasel words could put Howard and his ministers beyond the reach of their better feelings and give them up to bastardry. More direct and pungent language might have made the lie unbearable. This is not to assume that there were better angels in their nature to be found, but to remind us that this language anaesthetises both the users and the used. It poisons politics: the politicians, the media, the public service and the voters.

At a recent Senate hearing into that incident, a senior public servant was asked if the Prime Minister or his staff had indicated to her the importance and significance of her evidence: had they, in other words, leaned on her? She replied, I do not recall that being particularly the case."

I really hate the way the Prime Minister is often portrayed as a kindly, benign senior citizen…he’s not.

He behaves just like a schoolyard bully.